test conclusion
Sadly, the Bose SoundLink Color II can not compete with its siblings Micro and Flex. This is because of the low most quantity and the decrease IP safety degree. For the different test factors, he may even outperform the two compact containers. The wi-fi speaker delivers a extra balanced and highly effective sound. It has a jack socket and the Color II even performed longer than the different Bose fashions. The underside line is that that is sadly not sufficient and the Bluetooth field must be happy with a passable total score.
Learn product evaluations on Amazon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5397/b539703eb7e092a5df1c0faf06daee524d9e74e0" alt="Bose SoundLink Color II review: Size Bose SoundLink Color II review: Size"
In comparison with the SoundLink Micro, the SoundLink Color II seems like an enormous.
The Bose SoundLink Color II is as heavy and virtually as huge as a milk carton. It measures 13x13x6 centimeters (HxWxD), weighs 540 grams, may be very helpful and suits comfortably in a backpack. The Bluetooth field has a rubberized cowl and is protected towards water drops (safety degree IPX4). Nonetheless, in contrast to the Micro and Flex (each IP67), the SoundLink Color II doesn’t survive a dive. Other than the “colourful” black, the speaker is accessible in white, yellow and blue.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb5c6/fb5c6f9cc697e7e1583b9df214fb518a6a1bb02f" alt="Bose SoundLink Color II in the test: buttons Bose SoundLink Color II in the test: buttons"
I like the clear key structure.
For its compact measurement, the Bose field delivers a outstanding bass basis. Though it does not attain notably deep, it’s all the extra current in the higher and center vary. The sound is nice and heat. The interplay of the particular person frequency ranges is balanced. Nonetheless, the Bluetooth speaker shouldn’t be with out weaknesses: the mids are a bit unclean while you pay attention intently. A rhythmic guitar entrance degenerates right into a uniform mush. Nonetheless, this drawback happens primarily in genres comparable to metallic, in which the stringed devices work with sturdy distortions. The highs, on the different hand, are clear, but additionally pointed. The usage of cymbals is thus barely emphasised. However that does not have an effect on the singing. The field reproduces voices powerfully and with out disturbing discolouration. It leaves each Flex and Micro behind in phrases of sound. The largest weak spot of the SoundLink Color II is the most quantity: In the test, it solely managed 77 decibels. That is sufficient for the front room, for instance, however in a busy park, ambient noise might bury the high-quality sounds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62eff/62effc5a245507a42634b9d56c57ed34bfd4cf7e" alt="Bose SoundLink Color II in the test: Connections Bose SoundLink Color II in the test: Connections"
Economical tools: Solely the charging socket and a jack enter (3.5 millimeters) are on the aspect of the SoundLink Color II.
The Bose speaker doesn’t have in depth tools. Solely a stereo enter could be discovered on the aspect of the machine. Beneath that’s the microUSB charging socket and that is about it. There is no such thing as a technique to cost the smartphone. There’s a respectable battery in the little musician: In the test, the SoundLink Color II simply exceeded the producer’s specification of eight hours. At room quantity it cracked the 21-hour mark – and delivered a wonderful outcome. The Flex (17 hours and 38 minutes) and Micro (20 hours and 50 minutes) fall behind.
Bose SoundLink Color II in the test: conclusion
The Bose SoundLink Color II can not compete with its siblings Micro and Flex. This is because of the low most quantity and the decrease IP safety degree. In the different test factors, it even beats the two compact containers. The wi-fi speaker delivers a extra balanced and highly effective sound. It has a jack socket and even performed longer than the different Bose fashions. The underside line is that this isn’t sufficient and the Bluetooth field must be happy with a passable total score.